If you live in or around Sacramento, CA, we hope you will join us on 3/30/13 as we get rid of EVERYTHING in preparation for our big move to St. Maarten. Please see the attached flier for details or visit our Facebook event page at:
http://www.facebook.com/events/424681664285376/
Saturday, March 2, 2013
Saturday, January 12, 2013
Is The WWE Still A ‘Big Man’s’ World?
Is The WWE
Still A ‘Big Man’s’ World?
With the recent addition of Big E. Langston to the WWE main
roster, I got to thinking… does the current WWE product have one “body” guy too
many?
For those of us whom have been life-long WWE fans, fans of
the 80s, 90s and beyond; this question may seem almost laughable. For we can
remember a time when almost EVERY WWE Superstar was a “jacked up”, “body” guy.
From Ivan Putski, Nikita Koloff, Lex Luger, The Ultimate Warrior, The Road
Warriors, Kerry Von Eric, Warlord, (not to mention Barry Horowitz), almost
everyone was a ripped and chiseled mass of humanity.
It is only when you place the aforementioned question into
the context of the more “natural” looking Superstars of today, such as CM Punk,
Kofi Kingston, Dolph Ziggler and The Brooklyn Brawler that the discussion
begins to make sense. And lets not discredit the physiques of today’s stars,
heck, I would argue that the training regimen and level of discipline required
of today’s stars far surpasses that of their predecessors’.
The question remains however, using the stereotypical “big
man” ring psychology, is there room in the WWE for all of these larger than
life Hulks to co-exist? Lets get specific here; we currently have the most
impressive list of body builder-like, 300+ pounders in recent memory with guys
like: Mason Ryan (yes, he’s still employed), Ryback, Ezekiel Jackson, David
Otunga and now Big E Langston. How are they all suppose to “get over” using
their power and strength without looking stale and over-done?
Let’s face it; they can’t all be “monsters” that steam-roll
through their competition…that would get old and fast. Not to mention the
super-heavyweights like Brock Lesnar, The Big Show, Mark Henry, Tensai and
Brodus Clay; in today’s WWE; unlike in years past, it is becoming somewhat of a
limitation to be the ‘big guy’.
Big guys of today have far more considerations and
parameters to keep in mind than did the Superstars of years past. Not only must
they appear big and strong, even larger than life, but in today’s fickle,
fast-paced market, they also need to keep the audience captivated and
enthralled. And with such an unprecedented (modern era) number of heavyweights
and super heavyweights; they also must be careful not to scoop each other’s
heat by using the same move-set and mannerisms. Now therein lies a bit of a
conundrum.
In the 80s and 90s the solution was simple: gimmicks!
Everyone had a gimmick. They were quite useful in fact. They could be used as
somewhat of a crutch for the larger dudes that were….lets say, not as ‘gifted’
as some of the others (cough, cough, Ultimate Warrior, cough, cough). Others used their gimmicks as a means to
enhance or supplement their ring work. One of my mentors and dear friends Nikita
Koloff was one such star. The “Russian Nightmare” as he was smartly dubbed,
moved like a cat in the ring. The dude was a true workhorse. But he also had a
very well defined gimmick. He will even tell ya though; his Russian gimmick was
somewhat of a saving grace that helped mask his inexperience and technical
inadequacies in his formative ring years.
Through a combination of his almost herculean strength, awe-inspiring
ring presence and his very well developed Russian Nightmare persona, he was
able to get ‘over’ very early in his career, despite not having fully mastered the
technical aspect of his newfound vocation. Later, rather than merely supplement
his persona, he was later able to fully integrate and augment his technical
skills with his gimmick rather than the reverse.
The problem today’s stars face is that they don’t really
have the luxury of, nor does the audience really have the stomach for very many
gimmicked caricatures. No longer is the mawkish ‘warrior’, ‘barbarian’,
‘zombie’, ‘ninja’ or ‘assassin’ from ‘parts unknown’ considered acceptable (nor
should they).
However good, bad or indifferent these gimmicks were, over
the past 10-15 years however, we have witnessed the gradual retirement of these
passé gimmicks. The archaic and even racist restrictions – (i.e. all African
Americans & Samoans have ‘hard heads’ that are impervious to pain) are now
all but forgotten.
So that leads back to the question at hand; how do the ‘big
guys’ cope in today’s professional wrestling marketplace? The solution is
simple. In today’s modern era, we
have ‘hybrid’ stars. That’s the key. No longer are Superstars restricted to the
outmoded moulds and rules of years past. They’re now almost limitless in what
they can accomplish. Heck, a couple of weeks ago I saw a near 500 lb Big Show
throw a DROPKICK! And a damned decent one at that.
The question becomes, as the pro wrestling playing field
becomes more homogenized, where will this discussion be in the next 10-20
years?
I for one can’t wait to see.
Thanks for reading.
Joe
Sunday, December 30, 2012
Pre-med Discussion (Part 1)
Pre-med
Discussion / Q & A: (Part 1)
1. I’m planning on taking the MCAT in 2013.
While I’m on my winter break, should I start studying now?
Great question. First, it kind of depends. That is, it depends on when you’ll
be taking the MCAT. If you’ve signed up (or are planning to sign up) for one of
the earlier dates (Jan or March) then yes, I’d suggest that you get started
now.
With that being said however, don’t inundate yourself with
studying either. You no doubt just got through with another challenging
semester; give yourself a little break. The most important advice I can give
you though is to make a schedule for yourself and stick to it. For example,
give yourself a break through Jan 6th and start your MCAT prep on
Jan 7th. Don’t have the ambiguity of whether or not you’re going to
study looming over your head. Have a plan and stick to it.
I found some helpful online study schedules that I followed
for my prep. I’d be happy to email you them if you are interested.
2. Hi Joe, I want to take the MCAT next year,
but I don’t know the testing dates.
Hi, the AAMC posts the official testing dates on their
website (aamc.org). Not all testing sites have every date available however, so
you’ll want to look up the nearest testing site(s) to verify.
No site will have the reverse though; that is, no testing
site will offer MCAT examinations on days that are not listed on the AAMC calendar. Hope that helps. I’ve also
included the direct link for the official AAMC 2013 MCAT calendar below.
3. Did you use an MCAT prep company? If so,
which one? Did you like them?
I did use a prep group. I went with Kaplan for a number of
reasons but the primary reason was that I wanted a scheduled, structured
setting and one that would afford me direct (face-face) contact with the
instructors. The Kaplan course also offered unlimited access to the official
AAMC exams and an online Q-bank, which I really enjoyed.
With that being said however, I was not 100% satisfied with
their program. I definitely prefer the Examkrackers (EK) lesson books over the
Kaplan prep materials. EK just seemed to “speak my language”, if you understand
what I mean. I would read a passage on circuits for example, shake my head in
confusion in a “what the hell do you mean Bernoulli?! ” sort of moment and
boom. After the passage, a little saltine cracker cartoon would break down the
passage in clear, easy to read prose. Kaplan seemed (to me) to follow a shotgun
approach, whereby they’d throw everything at you but the kitchen sink, rather
than delivering a clear and concise set of principles to follow. Just my take
anyway…
4. What about extracurriculars? What should I
do and when?
You ask me excellent, excellent question Mr. Dan Malone (sorry, Iron Sheik reference there). The
Readers Digest version of my answer is this – do what you are passionate about.
I loved pro wrestling. That’s what I did for many, many years. In fact, ¾ of my
personal statement is about my career in the wrestling biz.
Don’t do something just to check a box. Application
committees see right through it. Plus, if you don’t enjoy it, odds are you are
going to do a lousy job and have a poor experience.
Saturday, December 15, 2012
When Tragedy Strikes...
Thank you all for joining us last evening....we are profoundly saddened, as many of us are. Alexia and I hope that you will join us by keeping the victims and their families in our thoughts and prayers.
A special thanks to St. Michaels Church for hosting us last evening and to those who turned out in support.
Fox 40 News Report
News 10 Report
A special thanks to St. Michaels Church for hosting us last evening and to those who turned out in support.
Fox 40 News Report
News 10 Report
Thursday, December 6, 2012
Personal Genomics and Obamacare: Medicine of the Future
With
the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the constitutionality of the
Affordable Care Act earlier this year and the re-election of President Obama
last month; it appears as if we are indeed on a precipice of a drastic shift in
focus with regard to how medicine is practiced in this country. In the coming
years there will be a dramatic emphasis in the area of preventative medicine
with respect to patient care. That is, rather than simply educating patients
about their disease and effectively treating their symptoms, under Obamacare,
physicians and other healthcare providers will be rewarded in the form of
financial incentives and rewards for keeping patients healthy! What a concept.
With this new focal point
however, some important discussions need to be had. Many people are unaware
that current technology exists that could in fact help identify pre-cursor
markers, or genomic “red flags” for various diseases and ailments. For example,
mutations in the BRCA family of genes could indicate that a person is more
susceptible to various breast and or ovarian cancers. The question then becomes
– do you want to know what secrets lie within your own genetic makeup? And how
can this information be best utilized for you and your family? These sorts of
questions has led to a relatively new branch of biotechnology and medicine
called “Genetic counseling”, whereby trained medical professionals help to review
potential preventative treatment options for the patient and their family.
Since
the initial completion of the Human Genome Project (HGP) in 2003, there has
been a race in the bioinformatics and related industries to learn more about
how to synthesize this vast amount of genomic data into information that can
help improve (and impact) the lives of humankind. Personal genomics groups such
as 23andMe, Illumina and others are looking to do just that. For a
not-so-nominal fee, of anywhere from $399-$499+ one could send a sample of
their saliva in order to obtain the percentage risk of the expression of
diseases and traits ranging from chronic migraines to Colorectal Cancer and
everywhere in between.
The
potential benefits of having this information at your disposal are almost
limitless. Should this technology become readily available, the growing
discussion of personalized medicine could come to fruition. The conceivable
implications of this would be that your physician could personally tailor his
or her treatment based on your personal genome in order to optimize your
results and minimize adverse reactions. Can you imagine the decrease in
healthcare costs in this country if we were able to eliminate the current
pharmaceutical cost that goes into the constant search for the next “magic
bullet” or “miracle pill” that will treat its target ailment with limited side
effects? With personalized medicine, physicians would be able to completely
sidestep this “trial and error” process and jump right into the optimization of
patient health and safety. With the seemingly endless list of benefits, there
are of course risks and concerns with regard to this process.
One
of the major concerns with regard to personal genomics is the fear that
insurers will be able to get a hold of your genetic information to determine
whether you are a financial “risk” to them. There is some legitimate concern
here as currently there are no provisions against such practice. Currently the U.S. federal legislation
has only enacted the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA), signed
into law on May 21, 2008, which currently only protects employee’s from their
employer using ones personal genome as a criteria for hire or salary. The
current verbiage does not address exclusion criteria afforded to health or life
insurance companies however. With
the available information however, the potential risks and benefits, I for one
am all for it.
The
Personal Genome Project (PGP) headed by Dr. George Church at Harvard’s School
of Medicine is seeking volunteers through an open-ended research project that
will collect the genomes of participants in order to better understand the
traits and characteristics that contribute to human disease. Participants agree
to have their genome sequenced and available for public viewing on the World Wide
Web. For those whom are apprehensive about this practice but wish to have their
genome sequenced, currently their best option would be to fork out the cash for
private screening.
I
for one feel that the old adage of “knowledge is power” reigns more true than
ever here. If I am at risk for Parkinson’s, Prostate Cancer or Rheumatoid
Arthritis for example, I’d like to take the necessary preventative measures and
treatments now in order to reduce my incidence of their expression. This technology can be an incredibly
useful and potentially revolutionary tool in the field of medicine and
research. It is going to be incredibly exciting to see how it is incorporated
into the new vision of preventative medicine under Obamacare going
forward.
Saturday, November 3, 2012
Pay it Forward
A few weeks ago I realized something that's a little disconcerting & yet at the same time also quite understandable. We live in a world where kindness, just for the sake of being thoughtful or kindhearted, is met with such trepidation, skepticism & concern that it is almost something of the unexpected.
For one to partake in a kindly act there must surely be an ulterior motive. Right? Perhaps this feeling, (or defense mechanism of sorts) has some sort of tribal genesis, rooted in a survivalist social order theory. Perhaps I'll bring this up the next time I have a chat with a behavioral psychologist....but I digress.
As a future physician, my innate disposition is one that is "other" focused; driven by the service of & compassion for others. That certainly doesn't make me a "good" person by any means, but that's just who I am. In fact it took me a long time to realize that even in my most earnest & sincere attempts to help people (friends, family, even strangers), that some folks just do not want to be helped. And that's okay. But me, I find pleasure in helping others. That's my "thing", my "gimmick" (a little esoteric joke for my wrestling family) so to speak.
A few weeks ago I began a Twitter initiative that I dubbed #PreMedGiveAways. Whereby I have pledged to select (at random) one of my Twitter followers each week, with a promise to send that person - free of charge, a pre-med resource of my choosing. The funny thing is, that the concept of sending a complete stranger a free gift (at your own expense no less), no strings attached, is sort of a strange idea.
I've shared my recent spirit of giving with a few people & invariably, each person's response has been "why" or met with such cynicism & disapproval that it struck me as odd. For my response to them is: why the hell not?
Perhaps there's some merit to their skeptical inquiries, but it's too bad that I feel like I'm setting off people's "Creeper Alerts" here. Ala: **WARNING WARNING** CREEPER spotted on Twitter, giving away free shit, WARNING, WARNING! Lol. I seriously feel that way at times. Especially considering that the majority of my pre-med followers are attractive young women & I'm approaching them unabashedly on Twitter with my promise to send them free merchandise. All they have to do is "follow" me. Yeah - by my own admission, I sound like a creeper! I can assure all of them however, I am a HAPPILY married man & my intentions are strictly of a platonic nature.
Irrespective of my mixed feelings on the matter, I am now enjoying the third consecutive week of this little #PreMedGiveAway venture & I've quite enjoyed myself. Although, in truth I'm not sure how much longer I'll be able to keep it up as my "stash" is quickly dwindling. Perhaps a pre-med prep group will catch wind of my little endeavor & will be so kind as to donate a few items to the cause. And if not, I still have at least a few more weeks worth of goods to share & if nothing else, I hope this little season of generosity has touched someone's life (perhaps you - as you read this now) & at least has in some way, helped brighten your/their day. For more information on my pre-med give aways, follow me on Twitter @Joseph_Gomes.
I'm gonna sign off for now, but I hope to share a rather interesting topic with you all very soon.
-Joe
For one to partake in a kindly act there must surely be an ulterior motive. Right? Perhaps this feeling, (or defense mechanism of sorts) has some sort of tribal genesis, rooted in a survivalist social order theory. Perhaps I'll bring this up the next time I have a chat with a behavioral psychologist....but I digress.
As a future physician, my innate disposition is one that is "other" focused; driven by the service of & compassion for others. That certainly doesn't make me a "good" person by any means, but that's just who I am. In fact it took me a long time to realize that even in my most earnest & sincere attempts to help people (friends, family, even strangers), that some folks just do not want to be helped. And that's okay. But me, I find pleasure in helping others. That's my "thing", my "gimmick" (a little esoteric joke for my wrestling family) so to speak.
A few weeks ago I began a Twitter initiative that I dubbed #PreMedGiveAways. Whereby I have pledged to select (at random) one of my Twitter followers each week, with a promise to send that person - free of charge, a pre-med resource of my choosing. The funny thing is, that the concept of sending a complete stranger a free gift (at your own expense no less), no strings attached, is sort of a strange idea.
I've shared my recent spirit of giving with a few people & invariably, each person's response has been "why" or met with such cynicism & disapproval that it struck me as odd. For my response to them is: why the hell not?
Perhaps there's some merit to their skeptical inquiries, but it's too bad that I feel like I'm setting off people's "Creeper Alerts" here. Ala: **WARNING WARNING** CREEPER spotted on Twitter, giving away free shit, WARNING, WARNING! Lol. I seriously feel that way at times. Especially considering that the majority of my pre-med followers are attractive young women & I'm approaching them unabashedly on Twitter with my promise to send them free merchandise. All they have to do is "follow" me. Yeah - by my own admission, I sound like a creeper! I can assure all of them however, I am a HAPPILY married man & my intentions are strictly of a platonic nature.
Irrespective of my mixed feelings on the matter, I am now enjoying the third consecutive week of this little #PreMedGiveAway venture & I've quite enjoyed myself. Although, in truth I'm not sure how much longer I'll be able to keep it up as my "stash" is quickly dwindling. Perhaps a pre-med prep group will catch wind of my little endeavor & will be so kind as to donate a few items to the cause. And if not, I still have at least a few more weeks worth of goods to share & if nothing else, I hope this little season of generosity has touched someone's life (perhaps you - as you read this now) & at least has in some way, helped brighten your/their day. For more information on my pre-med give aways, follow me on Twitter @Joseph_Gomes.
I'm gonna sign off for now, but I hope to share a rather interesting topic with you all very soon.
-Joe
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)